Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

header-right

header-section-1

header-section-2

In This Section

2025 Math Curriculum Adoption

2025 Math Curriculum Adoption

On March 23, 2026, the CCISD Board of Trustees approved new math resources for students. Learn more by watching the Board presentation and exploring the FAQs below.

 

What are the steps the district follows to adopt curriculum? 

The district follows a structured, collaborative process to select and adopt curriculum materials. Subject Area Committees, led by Math Coordinators, review and evaluate instructional resources and present their findings to the District Instructional Materials Allotment Committee (IMTA). The IMTA, in collaboration with the coordinators, then shares recommendations with the District Educational Improvement Committee (DEIC) to gather feedback. After considering this input, the recommendations are submitted to the Board of Trustees for final approval. This process ensures that curriculum decisions are thoughtful, transparent, and informed by educators and stakeholders.

How many materials were considered by the selection committee at the elementary level? At the secondary level 6th – Algebra I? 

At the elementary level (K–5), the committee evaluated six instructional material options approved by the State Board of Education (SBOE) as High-Quality Instructional Materials (HQIM). Similarly, for grades 6–8 and Algebra I, the committee reviewed six SBOE-approved HQIM options.

How many people were on the selection committee? 

Over 65 members served on one of the three Subject Area Subcommittees (K-5, 6-Algebra 1, Geometry/Advanced Math). The committees are made up of 80% classroom teachers with the remaining members representing parents, administrators and special populations representatives.

Why are we recommending Bluebonnet?

Bluebonnet is recommended because it aligns closely with CCISD Math Practices and instructional priorities while offering a comprehensive, fully supported math program. It provides paper-based problem-solving opportunities, created and aligned assessments, daily lesson plans and slide decks, and built-in support for both intervention and extension. The program also includes resources designed to support teachers at all experience levels, such as teacher-facing and student-facing videos, an online dashboard, and professional learning opportunities. In addition, a family portal helps strengthen home–school connections. Overall, Bluebonnet delivers a turnkey solution aligned to the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS), combining instructional resources, digital tools, and ongoing support to enhance teaching and learning.

Is there a cost incentive to adopt Bluebonnet Math curriculum? 

There is a cost incentive provided by the state. Districts receive $40 per student for selecting high-quality instructional materials and an additional $20 per student specifically for adopting Bluebonnet Learning to support the printing of materials. This additional allotment is intended to help offset printing costs and reduce student screen time.

Are we considering the adoption of Blue Bonnet curriculum because of the cost incentive from the state? 

We are not basing our decision on the cost incentive. Our adoption decisions are guided by instructional priorities and program effectiveness rather than financial incentives. While the incentive is a benefit, the recommendation to adopt Bluebonnet is based on its overall alignment to instructional priorities and the comprehensive support it provides for teaching and learning. 

Is there religious content in the Math Bluebonnet Curriculum? 

No. Bluebonnet Math does not include religious content. 

There are news reports of thousands of errors in the Bluebonnet Curriculum. Why would we consider adopting a curriculum with errors?

We recognize the State Board’s corrections and understand the concern. At the same time, many of those errors involve non-math content, such as punctuation or materials in other subject areas. 

We are recommending this curriculum with this knowledge of errors because, while they exist, they don’t affect the fundamental teaching of math. The program’s strong alignment to standards, instructional supports, and other benefits outweigh the manageable issues that will ultimately be addressed. The state is addressing these errors currently. 

What is the difference between the publishers of our recommended math curriculum – Great Minds and Carnegie – and Bluebonnet? 

TEA available instructional materials began as a COVID-19 disrupted-learning response, with resources released as “Emergency Release” products and later refined into Bluebonnet Learning. In math, the K–5 materials came from Eureka Math TEKS Edition (Great Minds), while the secondary materials came from Carnegie Learning Texas Math Solution. 

We are recommending Great Minds and Carnegie because they provide the full, comprehensive programs with stronger built-in supports, tools, and training for teachers, rather than the more basic, free state-provided version. 

Why are we proposing to adopt Bluebonnet/Carnegie materials over adopting Cambridge? 

Bluebonnet/Carnegie materials are fully aligned with the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS) and the STAAR assessment, providing direct support for state standards and accountability requirements. In contrast, Cambridge is an international framework designed for global pathways and is not directly aligned to TEKS. As a result, adopting Cambridge would require significant adaptation to ensure alignment with state standards for daily instruction and assessment.

Will we still use Cambridge materials in some intermediate classrooms?  

Yes. The CCISD Cambridge course will continue to be implemented using a blended approach. Daily instruction is grounded in Bluebonnet Learning as the core resource, ensuring alignment and consistency across classrooms. The Cambridge Framework for Mathematics, along with the Depth and Complexity Framework, is then incorporated to extend learning, increase rigor, and promote deeper problem solving. This approach allows the district to maintain alignment with state standards while continuing to provide the challenge and enrichment expected in Cambridge courses for advanced learners.

How widely has Bluebonnet Math been adopted across Texas?

More recent reporting suggests that adoption has continued to expand with over 650 districts having adopted elementary (K–5) Bluebonnet math and over 450 districts having adopted secondary (grades 6–Algebra I) math. This reflects a substantial statewide shift toward Bluebonnet as a high-quality instructional material (HQIM). Adoption patterns also vary by district size and region, but both small and large districts across Texas—including neighboring systems—have either adopted Bluebonnet or are actively considering implementation.

What digital content is available for Bluebonnet Math?

Bluebonnet Math offers a range of digital resources to support both instruction and planning. Teachers have access to a Digital Teacher Edition with annotation tools that allow for customization and lesson planning. The program also includes downloadable and customizable lesson slides to support daily instruction. Additional implementation and planning resources—such as course guides, assessment guides, sample implementation plans, PLC resources, and teacher development videos—are available to support effective use of the curriculum.

For classroom use, digital student workbooks and student-facing videos are provided to enhance learning. The platform also includes optional digital assignments and assessments, including STAAR-aligned digital assessments, giving teachers flexibility in how they deliver and measure student learning.

Are there additional supports and resources available for students who may struggle or excel?

Yes. Bluebonnet Math includes built-in supports to meet a wide range of student needs. At the secondary level, tools like MATHia provide personalized learning by meeting students where they are and helping them grow at their own pace, while each unit includes resources for both intervention and extension. At the elementary level (K–5), Math Catalyst offers targeted support for students who need additional help, as well as enrichment opportunities for advanced learners. Across all grade levels, the program is designed to provide meaningful differentiation, ensuring that every student is supported, challenged, and able to make progress.

What professional development will be provided for teachers using the new content?

Teachers at both the elementary and secondary levels will participate in dedicated professional learning sessions before each unit. These sessions focus on understanding the unit content, designing effective lessons, and planning instruction to ensure strong first-time delivery and maximize student learning outcomes.

How will this shift impact students entering 4th or 5th grade or do we believe it will be transparent to the students?

Students entering 4th or 5th grade should experience a smooth and largely transparent transition. CCISD students have been using the same instructional models and methods that will be utilized in Bluebonnet Learning. Any new models introduced will be purposefully connected to the work students have been doing in their 3rd and 4th grade math classrooms. Because our CCISD math instruction is deeply aligned with research‑based practices and the state TEKS, students will recognize the structures, routines, and approaches, ensuring continuity in their learning experience.